In May 2025, an infamous Oakland landlord known for the typical unscrupulous landlord behavior harassed an Oakland tenant by asking if she was a legal…
A partir del 1 de enero de 2026, el artículo 1942.8 del Código Civil de California prohíbe a los propietarios obligar a los inquilinos de…
Effective January 1, 2026, California Civil Code section 1942.8 prohibits landlords from requiring California tenants to use a particular internet service provider, typically imposed on…
El 6 de octubre de 2025, el gobernador Newsom promulgó el proyecto de ley n.º 628 de la Asamblea. Este proyecto de ley modifica el…
On October 6, 2025, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill No. 628 into law. This bill amends California Civil Code section 1941.1 to require landlords to…
In litigation, it is imperative that the plaintiff capture the defendant(s) testimony by drafting and serving a valid deposition subpoena. However, it often becomes necessary…
Our previous articles covered drafting deposition notices and the oft-required notice to consumer or employees in California litigation. But what good is properly drafting a…
Los inquilinos de California en casas viejas a menudo deben lidiar con sistemas de plomería anticuados repletos de sistemas incompatibles, accesorios anticuados, tuberías corroídas, líneas…
As mentioned in our previous article, a litigant in California may command the appearance of a party or non-party to a deposition through the valid…
You’ve filed a complaint with the court and served it on the defendants. Now, you wish to depose – a deposition is a sworn out-of-court testimony…
In May 2025, an infamous Oakland landlord known for the typical unscrupulous landlord behavior harassed an Oakland tenant by asking if she was a legal United States citizen. He then went on to reference immigration before then attempting to intimidate the Oakland tenant into negotiating a buyout of her tenancy. With federal ICE raids intensifying across the State of California and the Department of Homeland Security and ICE putting several states and cities, “on notice” (whatever that even means?). The landlord's, Darrick Chavis, coercive practices are ill-timed given the current political climate. Moreover, they are unlawful.
Citizenship is a protected class in the State of California. California tenants may look to the state’s anti-discrimination laws for guidance. These laws prohibit landlord or property manager from discriminating against California tenants on the basis of their citizenship. California Government Code § 12900; et seq.; California Civil Code § 51; 42 USC § 12101; et seq. Where the California tenant is a senior citizen, they have additional statutory protections. California Civil Code §§ 51.2, 51.10. Landlords and property managers may only verify a California tenant’s citizenship when required by federal law.
California Civil Code section 1940.3(b) also provides additional similar protections. Under this law, landlords and their agents are prohibited from:
Again, these protections do not apply when the landlord must verify the tenant, prospective tenant, occupant, or prospective occupants citizenship when required by federal law. California Civil Code § 1940.3(c)(1).
Additionally, several other laws also provide California tenants with protections against discrimination, harassment, and intimidation based on citizenship and immigration status. This includes:
Mr. Chavis’ iMessages seemingly violate California Civil Code section 1940.3. Not only does he fail to articulate any basis in federal law for inquiring into his tenant’s citizenship status, he proceeds to intimidate her into vacating – likely against her will – founded upon his perception that she may be an undocumented citizen. It is unclear if Mr. Chavis succeeded in ousting the Oakland Tenant and her family from their home. It warrants emphasis that his conduct also ostensibly violates the Oakland Tenant Protection Ordinance, specifically the prohibition against requesting an Oakland tenant's citizenship status. Oakland Municipal Code § 8.22.640(A)(6).