CLICK HERE TO READ OUR ENTIRE ARTICLE ON THIS MATTER. Nearly every tenancy in California requires the tenant to furnish a security deposit in exchange…
Amid the post-COVID-19 California eviction wave, many California tenants report being charged a fee related to their landlord serving termination of tenancy notices ahead of…
In the age of microtransactions, “junk,” fees, and usury landlord pricing schemes, California tenants can often face daunting amount of fees, including tenancy initiation and…
Amid the post-pandemic eviction wave, California tenants facing unlawful detainer actions based on deceit may wish to fight back against their duplicitous landlords. In addition…
In Garcia v. Myllyla, 40 Cal. App. 5th 990 (2019), nine (9) tenants prevailed in a jury trial against their landlord for various claims, including…
The Concord Rent Ordinance’s rent control protections (“Concord Rent Control”) protect tenants by limiting rent increases to reasonable amounts per year. For units covered by…
Under the Concord Rent Ordinance, Concord tenants are under the constant threat of eviction so their landlord can remove the property from the residential rental…
Under the Concord Rent Ordinance, landlords are permitted to terminate a tenancy to perform an owner move-in eviction or a relative move-in eviction, which requires…
The San Francisco Rent Ordinance requires landlords to pay San Francisco tenants interest on their security deposits. San Francisco Administrative Code § 49.2. This law…
California tenants protected under the California Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (“California Rent Control”) gain critical just cause for eviction protections and rent limitation provisions,…
Nearly every tenancy in California requires the tenant to furnish a security deposit in exchange for moving into the rental premises. Although usually an afterthought during lease negotiations and most definitely not given much thought at all during the tenancy itself, security deposits often become an animating force during landlord-tenant disputes upon the tenancy’s cessation. Recently, the California Legislature passed, and the California Governor signed into law SB 611, which makes several critical alterations and updates to California Civil Code section 1950.5, which this article will refer to as the California Security Deposit Law. This article provides a concise review as to how California’s Security Deposit Law is set to update in 2025.
A security deposit is defined as, “any payment, fee, deposit, or charge imposed at the beginning of the tenancy to reimburse the landlord for costs associated with processing a new tenant or imposed as an advanced payment of rent, used or to be used,” to cover:
Please note that a tenancy commenced on or before January 1, 2023 cannot be charged for cleaning under this law.
As stated above, a tenant cannot be charged for ordinary wear and tear. Ordinary wear and tear can be thought of as normal unit deterioration when used for its intended purpose. One court defines ordinary wear and tear as contemplating, “that deterioration will occur by reason of time and use in spite of ordinary care for its preservation.” Connell v. Brownstein-Louis Co., (1927) 86 Cal. App. 610. The extent of ordinary wear and tear may differ depending on the length of the tenancy. Common examples of ordinary wear and tear include, but are not limited to, faded tiles, worn enamel in bathtub, cracked glazing throughout the unit, worn carpet usually due to age, cracked, chipped, or faded paint, and worn toilet flappers.
Presently, California’s Security Deposit Law limits security deposits to two (2) times the monthly rent for unfurnished units and three (3) times the monthly rent for furnished units. California Civil Code § 1950.5(c)(1). These limitations are each one (1) multiple lower for service members, as defined by Military and Veterans Code section 400, one (1) times the monthly rent for unfurnished units and two (2) times the monthly rent for furnished units). However, service members with poor credit or a history of damaging prior rental units the default limitations apply, and not the reduced service member limitations. In 2024, 2025, and beyond, service member tenants with greater transparency by requiring landlords to specify, in the written lease agreement, why the service member tenant is charged a higher security deposit amount. California Civil Code § 1950.5(c)(4). But, the landlord must return the additional higher security deposit amount to the service member tenant within six (6) months of tenancy if the service member is not in arrears for any rent due during that period. Id. The written lease must also specify this date. Id.
Since a security deposit is money held to reimburse a landlord at the end of a tenancy in the event that a California tenant destroys or damages the rental unit, disputes relating to repair and restoration costs may occur. In 2024, 2025, & beyond, California’s Security Deposit law will include an express provision limiting repair and restoration works to, “a reasonable amount necessary to restore the premises back to the condition it was in at the inception of the tenancy…”. California Civil Code § 1950.5(e)(2)(B). This solidifies the often useful defense of excessive repair costs.
Carpet cleaning costs are often foisted onto California tenants with traditionally excessively inflated costs. SB 611 changes this by prohibiting landlords from charging California tenants for carpet cleaning, professional or otherwise, unless, “reasonably necessary to return the premises to the condition it was in at the inception of the tenancy…”. California Civil Code § 1950.5.(e)(1)(C). With the passage of SB 611, a de facto presumption against carpet cleanings, professional or otherwise, for security deposit deductions exists as the presumed default in California.
SB 611 updates California Civil Code section 1950.5 to include a provision seeking to limit landlords from imposing, “gotcha,” or “surprise” deductions onto tenants after they vacate their home. The reformed law provides that where the landlord and tenant inspect the property after the tenancy, the landlord cannot impose a security deposit deduction for unobscured repairs or cleanings not identified in the initial itemized statement tendered to the tenant. California Civil Code § 1950.5(f)(4).
Please note that this provision does not apply where a California tenant is terminated pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1161 (2), (3), or (4). California Civil Code § 1950.5(e)(7).
With the advent of camera phones and the proliferation of smartphones, photographic evidence is as accessible as it is assistive. In recognition of their widespread adoption, the California Legislature requires landlords to take photographs of the rental premises before or at the tenancy’s inception. California Civil Code § 1950.5(g)(1). Further, the law requires landlords to take photographs of the rental premises, “within a reasonable time after the [tenant vacates], but [before] any repairs or cleanings for which the landlord will make a deduction from or claim against the security deposit…”. California Civil Code § 1950.5(g)(2). Further, the law requires the landlord to take photographs after the completion of said repairs and cleanings. Id.
Further, where the landlord actually deducts from a California tenant’s security deposit pursuant to California Civil Code section 1950.5, the landlord must provide the photographs they took along with a written explanation of the cost of the allowable repairs or cleanings. California Civil Code § 1950.5(h)(2)(D). They may do so by mail, email, computer flash drive, or by providing a link where the photographs are accessible to the California tenant. Id.
No. The updates to California Civil Code section 1950.5 prohibit landlords from imposing security deposit deductions on California tenants when failing to comply with the California Security Deposit Law in bad faith. California Civil Code § 1950.5(h)(7).
These updates to California Civil Code section 1950.5 are already effective, or become effective on January 1, 2025, April 1, 2025, or July 1, 2025. For further details, consult with an attorney.