San Francisco Employee Protections 2019 Part II
The City & County of San Francisco shields workers from employer exploitation through the implementation of various laws conferring rights, remedies, and protections on employees. Not…
The City & County of San Francisco shields workers from employer exploitation through the implementation of various laws conferring rights, remedies, and protections on employees. Not…
The City & County of San Francisco shields workers from employer exploitation through the implementation of various laws conferring rights, remedies, and protections on employees. Not surprisingly, San Francisco employees are some of the nations most protected workers. This article provides a broad survey of the many laws actively protecting San Francisco employees. For more information about these laws, San Francisco employee protections, or to discuss an employer violation, please contact Astanehe Law for your consultation.
The Employment Development Department (“EDD”) administers the Unemployment Insurance program in California. Unemployed workers can receive up to twenty-six weeks of regular unemployment benefits as well as extensions. Understanding the program is crucial to obtaining Unemployment compensation. Mistakes and misinterpretations of program rules can render an unemployed individual ineligible for the benefits they paid into while employed. Continue reading this article to discover how California’s Unemployment Insurance program functions.
No person should be forced to endure workplace harassment. Although widely recognized, employers, managers, and supervisors do not always honor this oft-espoused precept. All too often, California employees must tolerate severe workplace harassment. Employer-perpetrated harassment, usually undertaken by a deplorable manager or supervisor, can garner feelings of helplessness because the employee may feel as if they must choose between challenging bullying or putting food on the table.
This choice is false.
In passing the program eighty-seven years ago, lawmakers intended to reduce the suffering caused by involuntary unemployment. However, the bureaucrats at California’s Employment Development Department (“EDD”), the state agency charged with administering California’s Unemployment Insurance program, often make securing unemployment benefits a time consuming, stressful, and burdensome ordeal. Don’t let EDD keep you from receiving the benefits you paid into while employed. Continue reading this article to learn how to apply for your unemployment benefits successfully and discover your options, should EDD deny your application.
Employees considering legal action against their employers should consider that a successful employer can get a fee award against the employee-plaintiff if the court finds that the employee brought the action in bad faith. California Labor Code § 218.5(a). Accordingly, do not initiate an action against your employer without contacting Astanehe Law for a free case evaluation first! Let Astanehe Law assist you in mounting a winning case against your employer.
Getting terminated is stressful. Further, an employer’s unfair wrongful termination is infuriating. However, a wrongfully terminated employee can obtain redress by enforcing their legal right to bring…
The City & County of San Francisco shields workers from employer exploitation through the implementation of various laws conferring rights, remedies, and protections on employees. Not surprisingly, San Francisco employees are some of the nations most protected workers. This article provides a broad survey of some of the many laws actively protecting San Francisco employees. To read our part one, please click here. For more information about these laws, San Francisco employee protections, or to discuss an employer violation, please contact Astanehe Law for your consultation.
Click here to read San Francisco Employee Protections Part I.
Click here to read San Francisco Employee Protections Part III.
Passed in 2003, San Francisco became the first locality in the nation with a minimum wage ordinance. The current minimum wage is $15.59 per hour. The City mandates an annual increase to the minimum wage based on the Consumer Price Index. Nearly every worker is covered by the minimum wage ordinance, except for a small number of government support employees, who are subject to a minimum wage rate of $13.79 per hour.
The Minimum Wage ordinance covers nearly all employees who work at least two hours per week in San Francisco. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12R.3. It applies to full and part time employees. The Ordinance covers undocumented workers. The minimum wage ordinance does not cover employees who are the parent, spouse, or child of the employer.
The San Francisco minimum wage ordinance applies to any employer that employs someone for two or more hours per week within San Francisco. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12R.3. Covered employers include any person, association, organization, partnership, business trust, limited liability company, or corporation, as well as corporate officers and executives.
The San Francisco Minimum Wage ordinance defines wages as compensation in the form of salary, hourly pay, piece rate, commissions, and non-discretionary performance bonuses.
Where an employee receives base and commission pay during a period is mathematically less than San Francisco’s required minimum wage amount, the employer must compensate for the difference.
The San Francisco minimum wage ordinance does not consider tips to be wages.
San Francisco employers must pay employees at least minimum wage.
Employers must display minimum wage and employee rights posters at job sites. The notices must be in English, Spanish, Chinese, and any other language spoken by at least 5% of the employees at the job site.
At the time of hiring, Employers must provide each employee, in writing, the employer’s name, address, and telephone number.
Employers must retain payroll records for at least four years. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12R.5(c).
The San Francisco Minimum Wage Ordinance includes an anti-retaliation provision. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12R.6. Under the provision, employers cannot retaliate against employees who assert their minimum wage ordinance rights, including receiving San Francisco's minimum wage. These rights include:
Where an employer takes adverse action against an employee within 90 days of their exercising their rights protected under the Minimum Wage Ordinance, a rebuttable presumption of retaliation arises.
Employers cannot force employees to waive their right to a minimum wage. However, employees subject to a collective bargaining agreement can waive minimum wage requirements so long as the CBA contains an explicit waiver that is clear and unambiguous. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12R.8.
Employees whose Minimum Wage ordinance rights have been violated may either report the violation to San Francisco’s Office of Labor Standards Enforcement (“OLSE”).
After an employee reports a violation, the OLSE is empowered to investigate the employer and conduct administrative hearings to resolve claims. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12R.7.
The employee can also elect to file a lawsuit in court against an employer. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12R.7(d).
An aggrieved employee is entitled to several remedies, including:
Please note that the $50 per day penalty is not available to City and County of San Francisco employees. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12R.7(g).
The OLSE is empowered to assess penalties against employers who violate the Minimum Wage Ordinance. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12R.16. The penalties are assessed as follows:
The law cumulatively increases all of the penalties by 50% for each subsequent violation of the same provision by the same employer or person three years. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12R.16. The maximum penalty amount that OLSE may impose upon an employer in a calendar year is $5,000, but $10,000 where a retaliation citation has been issued. Id. OLSE can even assess enforcement costs against an employer, including attorney fees. Id. But, the costs cannot exceed $5,000 per year. Id.
In 2006, San Francisco voters enacted the Paid Sick Leave Ordinance, which made San Francisco the first city in the nation with such a law. The San Francisco Paid Sick Leave Ordinance obligates employers to provide paid sick leave to all employers performing working in San Francisco. Under the Ordinance, employees earn one hour of paid sick leave for every thirty hours worked. Employers with ten or more employees may cap an employee’s sick leave time balance at 72 hours, while employers with fewer than ten employees may institute a sick leave balance cap of 40 hours.
The Paid Sick Leave Ordinance covers anyone employed within San Francisco, including part-time and temporary workers. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.2. The Ordinance also includes employees living in San Francisco that work from home. OLSE Rule 6.1. These employees must work 56 or more hours of work within San Francisco each year to qualify for coverage. Id.
Traveling employees that work outside of San Francisco, but travel through the city, are covered for all hours spent working in the city, provided they stop within and do not simply pass through. OLSE Rule 6.2. A typical example consists of delivery drivers who pick up and drop off in San Francisco. As with employees working from home, these workers must perform 56 or more hours of work within San Francisco each year to qualify for coverage. Id.
The Paid Sick Leave Ordinance covers any employer that employs someone for two or more hours per week within San Francisco. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.2. Covered employers include people, associations, organizations, partnerships business trusts, limited liability companies, corporations, and corporate officers and executives. Id.
Hires made through agents or staffing agents are also included. Id.
Paid sick leave is characterized exactly as in California Labor Code § 233(b)(4), which means that an employee may use paid sick leave when ill or injured or receiving medical care, treatment, or diagnosis. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.4. Paid sick leave also includes time off spent providing care or assistance to other persons with illness, injury, medical condition, need for diagnosis, preventative care, care, treatment, or any other medical reason. Id.
Employees are permitted to use their paid sick leave to care for their children, parents, legal guardians or wards, siblings, grandparents, grandchildren, spouses, registered domestic partners, or a designated person of the employee’s selection. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.4.
Paid sick leave also includes time taken to manage domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking suffered by an employee. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.4.
An employee can use their paid sick leave to donate an organ or bone marrow. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.4.
Under the Paid Sick Leave Ordinance, an employer cannot require an employee exercising paid sick leave rights to locate a replacement for coverage during the employee’s absence. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.4.
An employer may only take “reasonable measures” in verifying an employee’s use of paid sick leave. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.4(h). An employer cannot require an employee to disclose more information than is necessary for the employer to determine whether the employee’s absence is proper. OLSE Rule 2.1.
For example, after an employee requests one week of paid sick leave, the employer asks for documentation. The employee provides a note from her general doctor, which states, “The employee will be unavailable for work for one week due to a medical operation.” The note is legally sufficient, and the employer may not request additional detail, such as to the type or purpose of the operation.
Under the San Francisco Paid Sick Leave Ordinance, employers cannot require employees to provide medical notes or documentation for paid sick leave use of three or fewer consecutive work days. OLSE Rule 2.3. However, employers can request such items where a demonstrable pattern or clear instance of abuse exists. OLSE Rule 2.4. Additionally, employers can request a medical note or documentation where the employee is utilizing paid sick leave for an appointment. OLSE Rule 2.5.
Employers may require reasonable notice of paid sick leave absences. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.4(g). Generally, requiring at least two hours’ notice before the start of a shift is reasonable. OLSE Rule 1.3.
Under San Francisco’s Paid Sick Leave Ordinance, employees earn one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked. Employees become entitled to utilize their paid sick leave time beginning on the 90thday of employment, and immediately as it becomes available afterward. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.4(d).
Employers with ten or more employees may cap an employee’s sick leave time balance at 72 hours, while employers with fewer than ten employees may institute a sick leave balance cap of 40 hours.
Paid sick leave time balances carry over year-to-year. However, employers cannot cash out unused paid sick leave time. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.3(g).
Employers are permitted to make a lump sum payment of sick leave available at the beginning of the calendar year. This is called an upfront allocation.
Where an employee leaves and comes back within one year, the previously accrued and saved paid sick leave shall be reinstated. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.3(g).
Employers may not force waiver of the right to paid sick leave. However, employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement may waive their rights under the Ordinance. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.9.
Employers must post an official OLSE paid sick leave notice at job sites. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.5. The notices must be in English, Spanish, Chinese, and any other language spoken by at least 5% of the employees at the job site. Id.
Employers must retain records documenting the hours worked by employees and paid sick leave taken by employees for four years. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.6.
The San Francisco Paid Sick Leave Ordinance includes an anti-retaliation provision. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.7. Under the provision, employers cannot fire, threaten to fire, demote, suspend, discriminate, or take adverse action in retaliation for exercising protected rights, including the right to:
The provision contains a 90-day rebuttable presumption of retaliation for any employer adverse action against an employee. Id.
The OLSE is authorized to investigate violations, hold hearings, and order appropriate relief. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.8.
The Paid Sick Leave Ordinance includes a private right of action. San Francisco Administrative Code § 12W.8(c). Aggrieved employees may file a lawsuit in court against an employer. Id.
An employee whose Paid Sick Leave Ordinance rights are violated may be entitled to:
The San Francisco Commuter Benefits Ordinance seeks to combat greenhouse gas emissions by mandating employers provide a commuter benefits program that supports and encourages employees to carpool, bike, or take transit to work. If you work in San Francisco, the Commuter Benefits Ordinance may cover your employer.
The Commuter Benefits Ordinance applies to any person qualifying as an employee entitled to minimum wage or who has performed an average of at least ten hours of compensated work per week in San Francisco within the previous calendar month. San Francisco Environment Code § 427.
The Ordinance covers employers located in San Francisco and employs more than twenty employees nationwide. San Francisco Environment Code § 427.
Covered employers must offer one of the following transportation-related benefits to employees:
The San Francisco Department of Environment investigates violations of the Commuter Benefits Program. Despite not containing a private right of action, the City Attorney may bring a civil action to enforce the Ordinance. San Francisco Environment Code § 427.
Click here to read San Francisco Employee Protections Part III.